понедельник, 4 июня 2012 г.

6 major principles of a good site

6 major principles of a good site

6 главных принципов хорошего сайтаAbout it in the book «Bases контентной strategy» are told by the editor and the publisher with the long-term experience, the expert of company Brain Traffic Erin Kissejn

1. A good content — a pertinent content

Publish a content which approaches as you, and your users

In effect, it is a major principle of a good content: it should be pertinent for your business, for your users and for the general context of your mutual relations. Relevance can be shown in a way of giving of a content, its style and structure, but first of all — in the maintenance. The problem контентной strategy — to define, each of these elements plays what role your project and how to receive desirable result.

► it is correct for the user (and the general context of relations)

Let's reflect on James Bond. In spite of the fact that the bond is abrupt and clever, it could be lost kind one hundred times, there will be no at it a superprofessional command of support. The bond needs to pursue the villain, the command adjusts to it Aston Martin DB5. When the fine woman pours to it in a glass a poison, the command finds antidote. After the hero escapes from the lake teeming with crocodiles-murderers, the command provides to it a shower, the razor and ideally sewed suit. The command does not communicate almost with the Bond and does not spend its time for nothing. It does not anticipate its inquiries, but invariably offers it everything that can be necessary.

The content is pertinent when he helps users to achieve the object.

The content will be especially pertinent if will help them to feel the superheroes, carrying out especially important task. The ideal content gives to users everything that it is necessary for them, when it is necessary and in the most suitable form. And for this purpose you should get deeply into their consciousness (not to mention necessity to know that your "suit" is necessary to them «on a figure»).

Partly this exercise on a thought-reading on distance is connected with a context of your relations which should not be limited to an estimation and the analysis of methods of access to users or even detailed understanding of their purposes. According to content-strategist Deniela Ejzansa, the intelligent analysis of a context demands understanding not only the purposes of the user, but also its behaviour. What does it do? How he feels? On what it is capable?
It is a delicate theme. If I call in service of urgent medical aid on Sunday my context, most likely, differs from when I call to the allergist at o'clock of its work. If I look an underground card on a site at three o'clock in the morning for certain I want to understand, what trains go right now, instead of tomorrow to rush hour. When I search for your company in the Network by means of a mobile phone, most likely, I want to find numbers of your contact phones, instead of the detailed financial report for 2006. However our assumptions of a context in which there is a reader, never (despite all researches) will not be ideal. Always give to readers possibility to see more information (if they want it).

► it is correct for business

The content is pertinent for your business if helps you reach stably the purposes.

The business purposes can be formulated as «sales volume increase», «improvement of quality of work of service of technical support» or «decrease in expenses on polygraphy at manufacturing of teaching materials», but the basic problem consists in that processes of the decision of all these problems were steady.

The steady content is a content which you can create and support without quality decrease, without infringement of integrity and without that your employees suffered from frustration of nervous system. To you can seem that it needless to say, but a problem that in practice we too often make ambitious plans under the content publication, without reflecting, what efforts be required in long-term prospect for its maintenance.

By and large expressions «it is correct for business» and «it is correct for the user» mean same. In the absence of readers, spectators and listeners any content will be senseless. And the content created without requirements of users, will not bring to authors and publishers anything, except harm as unsatisfied users simply will start to leave.

This principle can be reduced to idea of the educated egoism: that harms to my users, harms also to me.

2. A good content — a useful content

Define clear and a specific goal for each element of a content; estimate degree of conformity of a content of its purpose

Very few people intentionally creates the boring content confusing or irritating users. Nevertheless the Network is overflowed by the senseless, empty and irritating information. And this information is not neutral — it takes away money and time, and also works against the purposes of business and its users.

To understand, your content on page, in the module or section is how much correct, you should know, on what it is directed. The reality allows to achieve the best results. Let's consider some possible variants of the content connected with a product, and its purposes.

► Sale of products. This purpose is too indistinct and, most likely, will lead to occurrence of an out-of-focus and empty content.

► Sale of the given product. Product sale represents the process including set of smaller problems, for example discussion of advantages, their binding to properties of a product, demonstration of result and value of a product, and also the offer on the purchase, directed on consumers. If your purpose is so indistinct, you do not represent, in what degree your content solves these problems (and whether solves in general).

► Transfer and demonstration of advantages of the given product. It already on forces to your content. However if you do not know, who exactly will get of advantage from product use, it will be difficult to you to make a specific proposal.

► Demonstration of how the given product helps certain group of clients. If you understand, what exactly is necessary for concrete group of clients can create a content serving to this purpose. (And if you do not understand that is necessary for them, and thus all the same try to sell a product you should worry about set of other problems, much more serious, than the content maintenance).

Now do the same with each element of a content in your project, and you receive rather useful list of the purposes which try to reach on an exit. If my offer frightens you, think, it will be how much more difficult to estimate, create or change to you a content, without having a specific goal.

3. The good content is focused on the user

Take advantage когнитивную of the point of view of your users

Within the limits of the web project the design focused on the user means that the end-product should answer needs of consumers and grant of their desire. From the practical point of view it means that days when the sitemap was reflexion of your organizational scheme, remained behind.
Donald Norman in book The Design of Everyday Things wrote about importance of understanding of mental model of the user which should precede design of products. He considers that the design focused on the user should pursue two aims: «1) the user can understand that to it to do; 2) the user can explain an event». The content focused on the user, should mention not internal mental models and a lexicon of the user, and it когнитивные the representations including set of elements: from model of the world to principles of the use of certain terms and phrases. It is necessary to dwell upon it. The EXAMPLE: the Best way to frighten off the user Allow me to result an unusual illustration. We will assume, you want to hang out a collection of photos of lovely and touching doggies. You understand what not to do without a hammer. Go to shop and ask where to find a hammer.

— Building tools and accessories, — the seller answers. — the fifth rack.

⇒⇒⇒⇒

— Welcome to department of building tools and accessories. Than we can help you?

— Hello. Where I can find a hammer?

— You mean обивочный a hammer for household use?

— Probably, yes...

— For hammers with a shock part of less than five centimetres the department of tools for the house use, located in the distant end of a rack 9 answers.
— Welcome to the Center of house tools! We have appeared thanks to merge of department of tools for the house and division of small sharp objects. Whether want to register in time convenient for you in which we could show our goods?

— The hammer is simply necessary to me... For the house.

— The bonus hammer for house use or a standard hammer for house luxe-class use is necessary to you?

— Listen, directly behind your back on a regiment the hammer lies. It is everything that it is necessary for me.

«<ACCESS TO THE DIRECTORY IS CLOSED»>

Please, return on a homepage of a site and try to find again that is necessary for you! The content of such style or such maintenance of a site can push away readers. It understands the majority of the successful organisations, however set of sites is all the same built by a principle of the corporate organizational scheme: they are filled by statements for the mission, intended for internal use, a corporate slang and terminology even in the description of the most simple and obvious ideas.

If you a monopolist offering unique and demanded services or products can not notice negative effects such нарциссического the approach to a content. But be not surprised, if one fine day your dinner somebody eats another — the one who will offer the same products, but in other manner focused on the consumer.

4. A good content — a clear content

Aspire to clearness in all

When we say that something is clear to us, it means that all works as it is necessary — we can acquire that speak to us. The good content talks to consumers on clear it language. It is organised so that it is easy for using.

Content-strategists usually rely on others — on copywriters, editors and experts in the field of multimedia, — so far as concerns creation and change of a content which users will read, listen and look. Working over large-scale projects, we can meet the majority of the experts involved in process of creation of a content never. But if we want to help to generate it a clear content we have no right simply to make the plan, to bring down it on heads of copywriters and to flutter out from office.

What it is necessary for you? To create a useful management on style of a content. To learn it is more about the organisation of the working processes connected with a content, how to hold seminars for copywriters and editors, and also, how to create tools for working out, such as content templates. All these methods help to form a clear and useful content, and throughout long time.

Certainly, clearness is a virtue to which should adhere and in other spheres of our work. Thanks to clearness it will be easier to formulate the purposes, to organise and hold meeting and other.

5. A good content — a logical content

Be consecutive, but within limits

For the majority of people language — the basic means of dialogue with each other and with an external world. The structure of speech and correctly built narration can lower degree когнитивной loadings on users and simplify perception of the information. Inconsistency, on the contrary, raises когнитивную loading, disturbs to understanding and distracts readers.

Here for what managements on style are necessary. Many experts on контентной the strategy which before were engaged in journalism or editorial work, are attached to certain style (for example, I adhere Chicago Manual of Style), however real professionals are capable to put design requirements above the personal preferences.

The logic of a narration cannot be universal, for example sites for doctors, or representatives of insurance branch different intonations for dialogue with various groups of visitors should use patients; at the same time many sites intended for wide audience, can use the same intonation. Also it is the content correct and focused on the reader. But the company allowing each manager on a product to create different kinds of a content, will be to break this principle, most likely: it is in that case satisfied with an ego of the manager, instead of requirement of readers.

6. A good content — a laconic content

Avoid an unnecessary content

Some organisations adore to place on a site great volumes of a content. Probably, they believe that presence on page under the name «About us» the organizational scheme, the description of mission and the purposes, and also a corporate commercial justifies days and the hours spent behind creation of this content. Probably, it seems to them that Google thanks that they weekly publish ten posts in the blog will tell it. It is represented to me that in the circumstances it is necessary to blame entropy: the Network gives enough space for placing everything. Of us it seems to some a case with uncountable boxes, therefore we and do not limit volume of a placed content.

What occurs, if content it appears too much? On the one hand, it complicates search of really necessary information. With another — distribution of final volume of resources to unlimited volume of a content leads to decrease in its quality. Abundance of a content is frequent testifies to deeper problem — a syndrome «is published everything that we can», substituting by itself the extremely useful paradigm «is published that is necessary for our consumers».

There is a set of ways to understand, what content actually is not necessary, — the traffic analysis, research of consumers and opinion of the editor can help with it. To begin with allow to result the list of typical "garbage" on a site.

► Statements for mission, the purposes and basic values of the company. If representatives of your company sincerely trust those or other abstract principles, it will necessarily be shown in their work. The exception makes a small amount of the organisations for which mission is a product, for example the charitable organisations. But also in this case the content should be accompanied by actual acknowledgement.

► Press releases. They can matter for the audience enough limited in the sizes, therefore in a raw state directly on site pages — an ideal example of an error in style «we always so do their carrying over».

► Long and not readable pages of formal notices. Probably, to you not to do without those or other legal documents but if you care of readers do not regret time and translate the text with not clear and not always the necessary legal language (even if it will not be pleasant to your lawyers).

► Infinite transfer of advantages. The majority of them are uninteresting to your readers. Characteristics representing the greatest interest can be organised in a subcategory that will simplify search and perception of the information.

► the Superfluous documentation. Whether you offer audiences three different kinds of answers to typical questions? Whether it is possible to unite or transform them into the tool of the contextual help?

► Audiovisual excesses. Whether on your site video data begin with a long fragment with a flying logo? Whether it is possible to reduce a 30-minute film till 10 minutes without loss of an important content? Cut down, reduce and offer ways how to avoid the similar.

For what Russians do not love oligarchs

For what Russians do not love oligarchs

За что россияне не любят олигарховThe professor of the Moscow State University and the expert concerning mutual relation of business and the power argues on that, for what Russians so do not love oligarchs

In Russia, and in many other countries, do not love the rich. And it is fair. I never heard, that though one rich person has told - and has told convincingly, - that he loves Russia. All rich are perceived in our country as favourites. The Russian word "success" is connected with a word to "be in time". That is to be rich in Russia, it is necessary to have time to appear in a proper place, to have time to snip off, have time to be protected something etc. And this situation will not change until rich men will not change, their mentality will not change.

It seems to me, the key moment and the Russian power, and for the Russian oligarchs has now come. If the Russian rich do not take the trouble to regain consciousness and be useful to a society — and it is the big and difficult work, — that dislike for them can turn back tragedy — both for them, and for country history. Already it is now obvious that any offers on раскулачиванию — from whoever they proceeded — will be widely supported by people.

Recently, for example, there was an idea to reconsider results of the first privatisation. And though it has not prevented to begin and the second privatisation, return process, nationalisation process, can begin at any moment. There are no doubts that if such question will be taken out on a referendum, the referendum is the offer will support. Also the power and not the people is guilty in it not, are guilty in it rich.

I will result a simple example. I have just returned from New York where was for the first time. Has visited there Rockefeller-centre. Before it the huge granite plate on which 10 postulates of a family of Rockefellers are beaten out lies. They begin words «I trust». These 10 postulates have to a certain extent affected perception rich in America. Thus, Rockefellers, strangely enough, much that have told to a society. They have taken the trouble to formulate the outlook, and before — to develop for itself personally such outlook which would be extremely useful for their country.

Today's Russian rich people have no outlook or simply do not want, that about it knew. They in a sense have told nothing to a society. And so cannot be. It after all very important class. Meanwhile, concerning this class in a society there is a large quantity of prejudices, it is a lot of negative and if on it not to react and not to answer, anything and will not change. Until rich men will consider themselves as skilful PR managers, and no more that, in Russia the bourgeoisie will not be accepted. And as long this aversion can exist — and will not pour out in something большее is already a matter of time.

It is necessary to hope that for today's rich men the following generation of rich men grows, and here they — already others. To me often ask a question that I think of children of Russian oligarchs. I think of them well. I should meet them, for example, in the Russian Academy the civil services much of them study there. Yes, there are spoilt «rich children», they are most of all allocated, they most of all irritate; but is and absolutely others — they quite realise that they did not need to appear in a proper place, they upon the birth have appeared rich, and it is them and distinguishes. Many of them have serious political ambitions, having thus certain ideals.

The following generation of rich men can be another if, of course, the generation of fathers does not miss the historical prospect. And for this purpose they should change, they should begin conversation with a society.

Russia needs what economic policy


Капитализм по-русскиIf to formulate a problem-minimum of the governmental policy it should consist in state preservation. Concerning an opinion problem-maximum can disperse depending on ambitions of a mode, its potential, representations of experts. Probably, someone will challenge the offered minimum and will count as its too low lath, but here we will apply a principle "do not do much harm". In due time such problem-minimum has appeared not on a shoulder to the Soviet management which has admitted disorder of the USSR, and a management of some the socialist countries – GDR, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia which also have ceased to exist.

Russia needs what economic policy

Kinds of errors

At all variety of wrong decisions they give in to some classification.

World outlook errors, that is choice of a strategic course and means of its realisation concern the first group, so to say. Incorrect there was the choice which made Bolsheviks in 1917 and has led the country up a blind alley. With self-liquidation of a planned economy owing to its own inefficiency the capitalist alternative – private property and market legalisation has prevailed. From this point of view Russia has entered nowadays on way of development historically checked up by another countries and can reach successes only on this direction. Turn would mean oblivion of lessons of 1917-1991, with the most negative consequences back.

On a boundary XX and the XXI-st centuries in the Russian literature discussion about has taken place, whether it is possible to consider lost for Russia the last century. The different points of view have been stated. Here it is necessary to consider two circumstances. First, if this question to consider in a context of one country, that is Russia it will not be possible to create a fair picture. The international comparisons are necessary. And they not in favour of those who considers successful the last century. Secondly, many present problems before which we stand, conduct the origin not from today, and since 1917. This date should be taken not literally, and as the beginning of a celebration of Marxist-Leninist ideology and its introduction in practical life.

Here can object: difficulties endured by the country lie completely on conscience of a Yeltsin management. Yes, lie. But not completely. The general conclusion will be that: the communistic doctrine has brought to the country system degradation at separate achievements whereas a management of new Russia, having directed the country in historically right direction, has made in the concrete plan a number of large-scale miscalculations. Who and for what here can be condemned? Anybody and for what. It is a question of fulfilments, unique in character. At first we dealt with transition of the country from capitalism by a socialism, and then back from a socialism by capitalism. Such experience at anybody was not, but on our experience many in the world can learn.

The second group of errors is formed by the defects connected with insuperable objective complexities. It is possible to name these cases inevitable – or pardonable. For example, poor quality of forecasts. In economy exists a lot of invisible on a surface and so a lot of not clear. Experts not always find common language even in an estimation of last development and current state of the economy, its motive forces. Difficulties immeasurably increase, when speech comes about the future time. Good luck in forecasts is casual. Individual qualification and the computer – weak assistants at forecasting.

The collective reason in the form of scientific research institutes and other organisations too guarantees nothing. The forecast is the programmed failure owing to unpredictability of economy. Here it is necessary to add radical defect of the most look-ahead practice: in all scenarios the method of extrapolation with amendments on assumptions of authors therefore there is a quantitative strengthening or easing of already known processes – dynamics and national produce structure, return of the live and substantiated work, power consumption of manufacture etc. Certainly is applied, all these indicators are important for the different purposes and they need to be counted. But forecasting «on a shaft» cannot replace with itself forecasting on the dangers, waiting the state and a society in the long term, and it just and remains behind a shot. Nobody can be charged for under what scheme the economy will particularly develop.

As unreliability of forecasting общепризнанна nobody bears responsibility for it, and it is quite logical. Looking at never-ending updatings, specifications and revisions of forecasts, it is possible to fix over and over again only weakness of human reason in future knowledge.

So widespread miscalculations are predictions of rates of exchange, for example, in an euro-dollar-rouble triangle. Here is not present and there can not be a constant hit in the purpose. It is possible to result and other facts from economic life when development of the separate commodity markets pretty often does not coincide with concrete expert estimations: the prices for oil, gas, metals …

Thus, the errors concerning this category, at all their undesirability can be though are somehow justified or explained by circumstances, on which operating subjects cannot render influence.

Interesting episode. In November, 2008 when crisis has already captured world economy, English queen Elizabeth II has visited the well-known London school of economy. During conversation she has asked scientists why they could not expect the come crisis. After a while the queen has received the answer printed on three pages in which it was told, in particular, that the main reason – «shortage of collective imagination at the brightest minds as in Great Britain, and all over the world which would help to understand risks of existing system as a whole».

It is necessary to note and one more – the third group of errors. They are entirely defined by the human factor and testify first of all to nonprofessionalism. About them speech also will go further.

Nonprofessionalism is not anonymous, it has the authors. However, often happens so that about authors forget, they fade into the background, and their defective affairs remain and correct ball. If not to resist to the incorrect policy and resignedly to suffer it it is possible to become its slaves. At the same time hardly it is possible to win this defect up to the end. It is so prolific and hardy that we are doomed to live in such environment. Goes – with variable success – eternal fight of prudence and absurd, and on the party of last there are, apparently, quite decent and dear persons.
The concept is offered

So, we build capitalism, but to do it it is necessary correctly. It should provide to us the best well-being, than it was at a former system. Otherwise what for successful counterrevolution of the beginning of 90th years was necessary? It is possible to tell that concerning the purpose the consensus in a society basically has developed. Is, of course, and opponents, but their minority to what testify parliamentary and presidential election. And here is how to build
– In this respect there is no accurate representation. Meanwhile from what way will be selected, rates of increase and its quality, labour productivity, competition of manufacture and other macroindicators depend.

We already repeatedly had to state in the press the point of view on this question. It was actively supported, in particular, by the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikolay Petrakov. In a short form we will result it once again.

In real Russian conditions the centre of gravity should be transferred on prime development of a consumer complex. It is starting point of improvement of economy. If it is not in due time considered, to it it is necessary to come back at later stage, but already with much bigger material and time costs.

In a situation when the general solvent demand is low, and on some kinds of production almost is absent, means logically need to be put in those divisions where this demand continues to exist constantly and never will disappear. The answer contains in a scale of prime requirements of the population – a food, clothes and footwear, medicines, habitation, transport (car). This set should become a state policy priority. Economy improvements can be reached through food and light industry, examples to that is available enough in a world history (in Russia capitalism has originally arisen as print, in England – as woollen), plus the medical industry, housing construction and the transport (motor industry), reflecting shift of requirements in comparison with last periods. Development of these branches is in many respects interfaced to support of small and average business. Here we will apply the term «catching up development» from the point of view both missed time, and branch economic policy. XXI-st century novelties will not get accustomed in economy which has not solved a XIX-th century problem.

The temptation is great to gather all «beautiful things» in world production and to declare this list the actual program of actions for Russia. Often and becomes. Certainly, it is impossible to be against such necessary directions of progress for our state as development of the software, carrier rockets for start of commercial companions, nuclear power, superhigh-frequency electronics, laser technologies etc. However will be useless to build high technologies without "ground floor" of economy which the consumer complex is. It will give necessary accumulation for прорывных technologies. Not scientific and technical progress will bring structural reorganisation, and structural reorganisation will provide base for scientific and technical progress. A fast turn of the capital and mass production – irreplaceable preconditions for introduction of innovations.

The structure of gross national product and personal consumption of the population prompts, what way it is necessary to go in a phase of market transformations: to support those manufactures, volume demand for which production is considerable and where the capital turn is short. These links of an economic chain – the most economical on expenses and the most productive by efficiency. Simultaneously they represent adequate natural base for lifting of national productive forces.

The neglect manufacture of the goods of the daily demand, making fast profit, has led to that the domestic market is in many respects given the foreign goods. Advantage of this business is underlined also by that circumstance that it live both trade (including челночники), and foreign manufacturers. Here the basic part of shadow economy is concentrated. Considerable commodity and financial streams can and should be won from foreign firms and are moved to domestic channels.

Prime development of a consumer complex has crucial importance not only for economy lifting, but also for improvement of a social status of people. Such course will allow to eliminate an insufficient food of a considerable part of the population in our country, to provide other vital needs and positively to affect catastrophically developing demographic situation from the point of view as population, and a genofund condition. The success of reforms in China has been predetermined by that there the paramount attention was given to a domestic production of consumer goods. It has allowed to satisfy the first requirements of people and by that simultaneously to create sources of accumulation of the capital for development of high technologies.

Government position

Let's look now that do our authorities for lifting of a consumer complex. In April, 2012 Strategy of development food and process industry of the Russian Federation for the period till 2020 has been confirmed by the government directive. The document fixes high import dependence of the country by separate kinds of production (25 % on import of meat and meat products, 24,6 % – fish and fish products, 19,2 % – milk and dairy products). As it is marked, there is below recommended medical norms a consumption of the major foodstuff, and it should cause anxieties. In 2010 среднедушевое consumption has made:

– Meat and meat products –

68 kg at norm of 70-75 kg;

– Milk and молокопродуктов – 247 kg at norm of 320-340 kg;

– Fishes and рыбопродукции – 21,2 kg at norm of 22-28 kg;

– Vegetables and бахчевых cultures – 105 kg at norm of 120-140 kg;

– Fruit and berries – 57 kg at norm of 90-100 kg.

Considering administrative standards in our country, it is necessary to tell thanks composers of the document at least that they this data does not hide. Here we recognise that statistics reflect existing realities.

The backward technical base of branches impresses. In крупяном manufacture of 30 % of capacities have started to be maintained after 1917 and about 14 % – pre-war construction. In the baking industry physical deterioration of the basic production assets makes 50–80 %. Made duly бумаготворчества Strategy paints on tens pages that it is necessary to make, create and construct, what risks should be considered at its realisation. However, except words, real efforts on position correction it is not looked through. The section about the financing sources, occupying is less pages, gives the most general information on current support of branches and comes to an end with following two lines: financial resources for realisation of positions of Strategy will develop of means of private investors and credits of banks. That is the government withdraws from the duties on a reorganisation of an economy or (at the best) intends to be limited to councils. Having noticed in the beginning that in food and process industry privatisation process is completely complete, it, probably, has decided to count that the complex will survive at the expense of own forces. This strange circumstance – budget nonparticipation in a food chain – has been noted in a Russian press ("Kommersant" see from 03.05.12). Further we will pay attention to following figures. The index of manufacture of foodstuff in 2000-2007 on the average made 106–107 % (for 2010 – 105,4 %). In 2020 manufacture of foodstuff should increase in 1,4 times at mid-annual rate of a gain of 3,5-5 % to level of 2010. If this data is comparable, there is a question: how the authorities plan to solve the listed problems (updating of capacities, competitiveness increase, импортозамещение, etc.) at decrease in branch dynamics, so far as they have not solved them under more favorable conditions?

All (all!) measures on lifting of economy bypassing priority development of a consumer sector by and large are useless. It is the sad fact of our economic history after 1917. No policy can rise over objective laws. Shifted on economy, they demand initial satisfaction of basic needs of the main productive force, labour. It is the base and while the given property of economy will not be understood, deciding shift in population life will not be.

The policy recommended by us would be favourable also to the government. It can and make further capital mistakes in other directions, suppose any expenditure for rather disputable projects, undersign for powerlessness in fight against corruption. But progress of national well-being on the basis of own manufacture will create powerful safety factor in an economy and a society.

Nikolay Petrovich Shmelev - the academician, the director of Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Valentine Petrovich Fedorov - the corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the deputy director of Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the ex-governor of Sakhalin.

суббота, 5 мая 2012 г.

работа для программистов(офлайн)

Привет моим дорогим читателям. Предлагаю Вашему вниманию хороший и перспективный офлайнбизнес- бизнес, который никогда не потеряет свою актуальность в реальной жизни. это бизнес не только для программистов, но и для людей, кто хорошо разбирается в компьютерах, кто с легкостью может установить всякие программы на компьютер.
Суть данного бизнеса заключается в следующем. Вы тщательно роетесь на просторах интернета, скачиваете всевозможные программы (лучшие программы с кряками на торрентах), и даете объявления в местных газетах о том, что устанавливаете программы и оболочки на компьютер с нуля под ключ. Остается ждать звонков и ходить по адресам и устанавливать программы на компьютера заказчиков.
Прибыльность данного бизнеса всегда будет актуальна, потому что каждый день покупаются компьютеры, а в магазинах компы продаются без операционной начинки. Если договориться с консультантами в магазинах за определенный процент, то от заказчиков отбоя не будет. Я в свое время сам нанимал студентов программистов, так как не успевал по всем заказам.
Удачного Вам здоровья и больших денег.
привет всем читателям моего блога. Недавно зарегистрировался на одном американском сайте.

воскресенье, 1 апреля 2012 г.

опросник




Привет моим дорогим  читателям. На протяжении, ну, порядка двух лет я в интернете занимаюсь тем, что отвечаю на опрос листы на сайтах, которые занимаются опросами своих пользователей. Сегодняшняя тематика опросов сильно поменялась. не то, что было два, а то и пять лет назад. Если Вам говорят, что на опросниках можно получить бешеные деньги, то не верьте этому. Все это обман, или информация которая к Вам попала просто устарела. Я лично зарегистрирован на более двух ста сайтов, которые занимаются опросами. Половина из них высылает мне регулярно по одному опроснику в месяц. Остальная часть коренным образом поменяла свою деятельность. В основном они занимаются офертами. Это когда Вам предлагают зайти на сайт, зарегистрироваться, и что- либо там сделать. Сейчас объясню. Вы заходите на сайт, регистрируйтесь и либо покупаете что- либо, если это какой- либо магазин, оформляете кредитную карту, если это банк. Есть бесплатные оферты, но потом Вашу почту начнут безбожно спамить. Хочу Вам прорекламировать один опрос сайт. Он тоже занимается и опросами и офертами, но у него есть один хороший плюс для наших российских лентяев и для тех, кто часами сидят в майлру. Вам приходят ссылки с этого сайта, Вы кликаете по нему, переходите на этот сайт и зарабатываете 20- 40 центов, так как это сайт американский. Я проверял, он допускает регистрацию в системе майлру. В принципе больше ничего делать не нужно. Если хотите, то можно пройтись по офертам, тогда заработаете больше. В день я выбивал по доллару за клики. За месяц можно накопить на оплату за интернет. Этот вид пассивного заработка намного лучше чем сидеть на САРах и кликать за копейки. Думайте и регистрируйтесь на данном сайте.

фотохостинг

Привет всем моим читателям. Продолжая тему о заработке, хочу показать Вам очередной пассивный метод заработка в интернет. Недавно откопал хороший сайт фотохостинга. Как сам он о себе пишет: "это фотохостинг, на котором вы можете максимально эффективно заработать на картинках. Мы предоставляем вам уникальную возможность не только хранить у нас картинки, но и бесплатно размещать рекламу на страницах с вашими картинками. На данный момент возможно размещение до 4 баннеров включая реферальный (в том числе: графические, flash-баннеры, тизеры, JS-реклама + реклама по технологии click-under или pop-under) на странице с картинкой.
В отличии от других хостингов картинок, мы не будем платить вам копейки за просмотры ваших изображений. Мы дадим вам возможность заработать больше, разместив вашу рекламу партнерок на странице с вашей картинкой!" Думаю, чем размещать свои фото в майлфото, так лучше зарегистрироваться на этом сайте, показывать интересные картинки и при этом зарабатывать. Спешите! Спешите! Раньше начнете, раньше и заработаете.